MH/SUD PARITY; REQUIRE                                                                  S.B. 27:

                                                                     SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL

                                                                                              IN COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bill 27 (as introduced 1-18-23)

Sponsor:  Senator Sarah Anthony

Committee:  Health Policy

 

Date Completed:  6-12-23

 


CONTENT

 

The bill would amend Chapter 34 (Disability Insurance Policies) of the Insurance Code to require an insurer that delivered, issued for delivery, or renewed a health insurance policy in the State to provide coverage for mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment, at a level of benefits that was no less favorable than the level provided for physical illness.

 

The benefits would have to meet the requirements of 42 USC 300gg-26, the Federal Law that governs parity between mental health disorder or substance abuse disorder (MH/SUD) benefits and physical medical benefits, and the regulations promulgated under that law.

 

Proposed MCL 500.3406z                                                                               

 

PREVIOUS LEGISLATION

(Please note: This section does not provide a comprehensive account of all previous legislative efforts on the relevant subject matter.)

 

The bill is a reintroduction of House Bill 5709 from the 2021-2022 Legislative Session.

 

                                                                      Legislative Analyst:  Alex Krabill

 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bill would have no fiscal impact on State government. Federal law generally prevents group health plans and health insurance issuers that provide MH/SUD benefits from imposing less favorable benefit limitations on those benefits than on physical medical benefits.[1] These requirements apply to the Medicaid and Children’s Health Insurance Program meaning there is no fiscal impact to the State. For local units of government, to the extent that a local unit of government provides health insurance benefits that are not covered under Federal statue and rulemaking, there could be a fiscal cost depending on the cost to comply with the benefit parity specified in the bill.

                                                                       Fiscal Analyst:  John P. Maxwell

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.

 



[1] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, The Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act (MHPAEA).

 

SAS\S2324\s27sa

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.