PENALTIES FOR CRIMES AGAINST ANIMALS                                                 S.B. 28 & 29:

                                                                                  SUMMARY OF INTRODUCED BILL

                                                                                                         IN COMMITTEE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Senate Bills 28 and 29 (as introduced 1-22-15)

Sponsor:  Senator Steven Bieda (S.B. 28)

               Senator Rick Jones (S.B. 29)

Committee:  Judiciary

 

Date Completed:  1-27-15

 

CONTENT

 

Senate Bill 28 would amend the Michigan Penal Code to do the following:

 

 --    Establish first, second, and third degrees of killing or torturing an animal, and increase the maximum prison term for a first- or second-degree offense.

 --    Revise and enhance the graduated penalties for animal neglect or cruelty.

 --    Extend current animal neglect or cruelty prohibitions to a breeder or pet shop operator.

 --    Establish a felony penalty for animal neglect or cruelty by a breeder or pet shop operator who had five or more prior convictions under Public Act 287 of 1969 (which regulates pet shops).

 --    Allow a court to include at least five years' probation as part of a sentence for an animal neglect or cruelty offense involving 25 or more animals, or three or more prior convictions.

 

Senate Bill 29 would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to do the following:

 

 --    Revise the sentencing guidelines for animal neglect or cruelty and establish sentencing guidelines designations for the penalties proposed by Senate Bill 28.

 --    Establish sentencing guidelines designations for first-, second-, and third-degree violations involving animal torture.

 --    Revise sentencing guidelines scoring requirements for several offense variables.

 

Senate Bill 29 is tie-barred to Senate Bill 28, which would take effect on April 1, 2016.

 

Senate Bill 28

 

Animal Neglect or Cruelty

 

Under Section 50 of the Penal Code, a person who owns, possesses, is in charge of, or has custody of an animal is prohibited from doing any of the following:

 

 --    Failing to provide an animal with adequate care.

 --    Cruelly driving, working, or beating an animal, or causing it to be cruelly driven, worked, or beaten.

 --    Carrying or causing to be carried in or upon a vehicle or otherwise any live animal whose feet or legs are tied together, except an animal being transported for medical care or a horse whose feet are hobbled to protect it during transport, or in any other cruel and inhumane manner.


 --    Carrying or causing to be carried a live animal in or upon a vehicle or otherwise without providing a secure space, rack, car, crate, or cage in which livestock may stand and in which all other animals may stand, turn around, and lie down during transport or while awaiting slaughter.

 --    Abandoning an animal or causing an animal to be abandoned, without making provisions for the animal's adequate care, unless premises are vacated for the protection of human life or the prevention of injury to a human.

 --    Negligently allowing any animal, including one that is aged, diseased, maimed, hopelessly sick, disabled, or nonambulatory, to suffer unnecessary neglect, torture, or pain.

 --    Tethering a dog unless the tether is at least three times the length of the dog and is attached to a harness or nonchoke collar designed for tethering.

 

The bill would extend those prohibitions to a breeder and an operator of a pet shop. "Breeder" would mean a person who breeds animals for the purpose of making a profit. "Pet shop" would mean a place where animals are sold or offered for sale, exchange, or transfer.

 

Currently, a violation of Section 50 is punishable as shown in Table 1, based on the number of animals involved, the prior convictions of the offender for this crime, and whether an animal died. An offender also may be ordered to pay the costs of prosecution.

 

Table 1

Animals Involved or Prior Convictions

Maximum

Imprisonment

Maximum Fine

Maximum

Community Service

1 animal1)

93 days

$1,000

200 hours

2 or 3 animals, or the death of an animal1)

1 year

$2,000

300 hours

4 to 9 animals, or 1 prior conviction2)

2 years

$2,000

300 hours

10 or more animals, or 2 or more priors2)

4 years

$5,000

500 hours

1) misdemeanor. 2) felony.

 

Under the bill, the first three levels of penalties would be the same. The current penalty for a violation involving 10 or more animals (or two prior convictions) would apply to a violation involving 10 to 24 animals. A violation involving 25 or more animals, or three or more prior convictions, would be a felony punishable by up to seven years' imprisonment, a maximum fine of $10,000, and up to 500 hours of community service.

 

Also, as part of the sentence imposed for a violation involving 25 or more animals, or an offender with three or more prior convictions, the court could place the defendant on probation for any term of years, but not less than five years.

 

If a breeder or pet shop owner violated Section 50 (regardless of the number of animals or prior convictions) and he or she had five or more prior convictions for violating Public Act 287 of 1969, the violation of Section 50 would be a felony punishable by imprisonment for up to two years, a maximum fine of $5,000, or both. (Public Act 287 of 1969 generally prohibits pet shop operators from selling dogs or cats that are too young, have not been inoculated, or lack veterinarian health certificates and other health records. A violation of the Act is a misdemeanor.)

 

Killing or Torturing Animals

 

Section 50b of the Code prohibits a person from doing any of the following without just cause:

 

 --    Knowingly killing, torturing, mutilating, maiming, disfiguring, or poisoning an animal.

 --    Committing a reckless act knowing or having reason to know that it will cause an animal to be killed, tortured, mutilated, maimed, or disfigured.

 

The bill also would prohibit a person from knowingly killing, torturing, mutilating, maiming, disfiguring, or poisoning an animal or threatening to do so with the intent to cause mental suffering or distress to a person or to exert control over a person.

 

The bill would establish first, second, and third degrees of the offense of killing or torturing animals. Except as provided below, an offense would be third-degree killing or torturing animals.

 

A person would be guilty of a first-degree offense if he or she intentionally and knowingly killed, tortured, mutilated, maimed, disfigured, or poisoned a companion animal and did so or threatened to do so with the intent to cause mental suffering or distress to a person or to exert control over a person.

 

A person would be guilty of a second-degree offense if he or she intentionally and knowingly killed, tortured, mutilated, maimed, disfigured, or poisoned a companion animal or knowingly did so or threatened to do so with the intent to cause mental suffering or distress to a person or to exert control over a person.

 

Currently, a violation is a felony punishable by up to four years' imprisonment and/or a maximum fine of $5,000 for a single animal and $2,500 for each additional animal involved in the violation, but not more than a total of $20,000, and/or up to 500 hours of community service.

 

Under the bill, first-, second-, and third-degree killing or torturing of animals would be felonies, punishable as shown in Table 2.

 

Table 2

Degree of Offense

Maximum

Imprisonment

Maximum Fine

Maximum Community Service

First

10 years

$5,000

500 hours

Second

7 years

$5,000

500 hours

Third

4 years

$5,000

500 hours

 

In addition, the court could order a term of imprisonment imposed for the violation to be served consecutively to a term of imprisonment imposed for any other crime, including any other violation of law arising out of the same transaction as a violation of Section 50b.

 

The Code defines "animal" as any vertebrate other than a human being. The bill would define "companion animal" as an animal that is commonly considered to be, or is considered by its owner to be, a pet. The term would include, but not be limited to, canines and felines.

 

Senate Bill 29

 

Sentencing Guidelines Designations

 

Currently, animal neglect or cruelty involving four or more animals but fewer than 10, or one prior conviction, is a Class G felony against the public order, with a statutory maximum sentence of two years' imprisonment. Under the bill, that offense would be a Class F felony.

 

Animal neglect or cruelty involving 10 or more animals, or two or more prior convictions, is a Class F felony against the public order, with a statutory maximum sentence of four years' imprisonment. Under the bill, instead, animal neglect or cruelty involving 10 or more animals, but fewer than 25, or two prior convictions would be a Class E felony against the public order with a statutory maximum sentence of four years' imprisonment.

 

The bill also would add sentencing guidelines designations, as shown in Table 3.

 

Table 3

Offense

Felony Class & Category

Statutory

Maximum Sentence

Neglect or cruelty involving 25 or more animals, or 3 or more prior convictions

E-Public Order

7 years

Neglect or cruelty by breeder or pet shop operator with 5 or more prior violations of Public Act 287 of 1969

E-Public Order

2 years

 

Currently, killing or torturing animals is a Class F felony against property, punishable by a statutory maximum sentence of four years' imprisonment. The bill would classify first-, second-, and third-degree offenses of killing or torturing animals, as shown in Table 4.

 

Table 4

Offense

Felony Class & Category

Statutory

Maximum Sentence

First degree

D-Property

10 years

Second degree

E-Property

7 years

Third degree

F-Property

4 years

 

Sentencing Guidelines Scoring

 

The Code of Criminal Procedure includes instructions for calculating sentencing guidelines scores, based on a formula that considers offense variables (OVs) and prior record variables.

 

Offense variable 4 is psychological injury to a victim. The bill would require five points to be assigned for OV 4 for first-, second-, or third-degree killing or torturing of animals if serious psychological injury requiring professional treatment occurred to the owner of a companion animal.

 

Offense variable 10 is exploitation of a vulnerable victim. The Code requires 10 points to be assigned for OV 10 if the offender exploited a victim's physical disability, mental disability, youth or agedness, or a domestic relationship, or the offender abused his or her authority status. Five points must be assigned if the offender exploited a victim by his or her difference in size or strength, or both, or exploited a victim who was intoxicated, under the influence of drugs, asleep, or unconscious. "Exploit" means to manipulate a victim for selfish or unethical purposes. Under the bill, the term also would mean to violate Section 50b of the Michigan Penal Code (killing or torturing animals) for the purpose of manipulating a victim for selfish or unethical purposes.

 

Offense variable 16 is property obtained, damaged, lost, or destroyed. The bill would require 25 points to be assigned for OV 16 for a conviction under Section 50 of the Penal Code (animal neglect or cruelty) if the property involved were more than 25 animals. Ten points would have to be assigned for a conviction under Section 50 if the property involved were 10 or more, but fewer than 25, animals.

 

Offense variable 19 is threat to the security of a penal institution or court or interference with the administration of justice or the rendering of emergency services. The bill would require 10 points to be assigned for OV 19 if the offender directly or indirectly violated a personal protection order.

 

MCL 750.50 & 750.50b (S.B. 28)                                 Legislative Analyst:  Patrick Affholter

       777.16b et al. (S.B. 29)


 

FISCAL IMPACT

 

The bills could result in a fiscal cost to the State's corrections budget. In 2013, there were 39 violations under this offense category with zero offenders sent to prison and six sent to jail. With the revised and new violations there could be an increase in the number of years a given offender would serve in a correctional facility if sentenced there. For any new felony sentence convictions, in the short term, the marginal cost to State government would be approximately $4,100 per additional prisoner per year. Over the long term, the marginal cost to State government would be approximately $31,100 per additional prisoner per year. With any increase in the number of felony cases, costs to local courts and law enforcement could increase. Additionally, any increase in collected fine revenue would be dedicated to public libraries.

 

                                                                                      Fiscal Analyst:  John Maxwell

 

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.