HOUSE BILL No. 4529

 

April 10, 2013, Introduced by Reps. McMillin, Lipton, Heise, Lyons, Haveman, Yonker, Muxlow, Walsh, Callton, Cavanagh, Roberts, Townsend, Darany, Irwin, Singh, Howrylak, Somerville, Dillon, Hovey-Wright, Brown, Ananich, Hobbs, Durhal, Switalski and Oakes and referred to the Committee on Criminal Justice.

 

     A bill to create the Michigan indigent defense commission and

 

to provide for its powers and duties; to provide indigent

 

defendants in criminal cases with effective assistance of counsel;

 

to provide standards for the appointment of legal counsel; and to

 

provide for certain appropriations and grants.

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:

 

     Sec. 1. This act shall be known and may be cited as the

 

"Michigan indigent defense commission act".

 

     Sec. 3. As used in this act:

 

     (a) "Adult" means either of the following:

 

     (i) An individual 17 years of age or older.

 

     (ii) An individual less than 17 years of age at the time of the

 

commission of a felony if any of the following conditions apply:

 

     (A) During consideration of a petition filed under section 4

 


of chapter XIIA of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL

 

712A.4, to waive jurisdiction to try the individual as an adult and

 

upon granting a waiver of jurisdiction.

 

     (B) The prosecuting attorney designates the case under section

 

2d(1) of chapter XIIA of the probate code of 1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL

 

712A.2d, as a case in which the juvenile is to be tried in the same

 

manner as an adult.

 

     (C) During consideration of a request by the prosecuting

 

attorney under section 2d(2) of chapter XIIA of the probate code of

 

1939, 1939 PA 288, MCL 712A.2d, that the court designate the case

 

as a case in which the juvenile is to be tried in the same manner

 

as an adult.

 

     (D) The prosecuting attorney authorizes the filing of a

 

complaint and warrant for a specified juvenile violation under

 

section 1f of chapter IV of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA

 

175, MCL 764.1f.

 

     (b) "Effective assistance of counsel" or "effective

 

representation" means legal representation that is compliant with

 

standards established by the appellate courts of this state and the

 

appellate courts of the United States.

 

     (c) "Indigent" means meeting 1 or more of the conditions

 

described in section 11(3).

 

     (d) "Indigent criminal defense services" means local legal

 

defense services provided to a defendant and to which both of the

 

following conditions apply:

 

     (i) The defendant is being prosecuted or sentenced for a crime

 

for which an individual may be imprisoned upon conviction,

 


beginning with the defendant's initial appearance in court to

 

answer to the criminal charge.

 

     (ii) The defendant is determined to be indigent under section

 

11(3).

 

     (e) Indigent criminal defense services do not include services

 

authorized to be provided under the appellate defender act, 1978 PA

 

620, MCL 780.711 to 780.719.

 

     (f) "Indigent criminal defense system" or "system" means

 

either of the following:

 

     (i) The local unit of government that funds a trial court

 

combined with each and every trial court funded by the local unit

 

of government.

 

     (ii) If a trial court is funded by more than 1 local unit of

 

government, those local units of government, collectively, combined

 

with each and every trial court funded by those local units of

 

government.

 

     (g) "Local share" or "share" means an indigent criminal

 

defense system's average annual expenditure for indigent criminal

 

defense services in the 3 fiscal years immediately preceding the

 

creation of the MIDC under this act, excluding money reimbursed to

 

the system by individuals determined to be partially indigent.

 

     (h) "MIDC" or "commission" means the Michigan indigent defense

 

commission created under section 5.

 

     Sec. 5. (1) The Michigan indigent defense commission is

 

created in the judicial branch of state government.

 

     (2) The MIDC shall retain as an autonomous entity all

 

statutory authority, powers, duties, functions, records, personnel,

 


property, unexpended balances of appropriations, allocations, and

 

other functions, including the functions of budgeting, personnel,

 

locating offices, and other management functions. Any portion of

 

funds appropriated to the MIDC that is not expended in a state

 

fiscal year shall not lapse to the general fund but shall be

 

carried forward in a work project account that is in compliance

 

with section 451a of the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431,

 

MCL 18.1451a, for use in the following state fiscal year.

 

     (3) The MIDC shall propose minimum standards for the local

 

delivery of indigent criminal defense services providing effective

 

assistance of counsel to adults throughout this state. These

 

minimum standards shall be designed to ensure the provision of

 

indigent criminal defense services that meet constitutional

 

requirements for effective assistance of counsel. The commission

 

shall convene a public hearing before a proposed standard is

 

submitted to the supreme court. A minimum standard proposed under

 

this subsection shall be submitted to the supreme court. The

 

supreme court shall approve or disapprove a proposed minimum

 

standard within 180 days of its submission. A proposed minimum

 

standard shall be final when it is approved by the supreme court.

 

If the supreme court neither approves nor disapproves, then the

 

standard is not approved.

 

     (4) The MIDC shall identify and encourage best practices for

 

delivering the effective assistance of counsel to indigent

 

defendants charged with crimes.

 

     Sec. 7. (1) The MIDC includes 15 voting members and the ex

 

officio member described in subsection (2). The 15 voting members

 


shall be appointed by the governor for terms of 4 years, except as

 

provided in subsection (4). Subject to subsection (3), the governor

 

shall appoint members under this subsection as follows:

 

     (a) Two members submitted by the speaker of the house of

 

representatives.

 

     (b) Two members submitted by the senate majority leader.

 

     (c) One member from a list of 3 names submitted by the supreme

 

court chief justice.

 

     (d) Three members from a list of 9 names submitted by the

 

criminal defense attorney association of Michigan.

 

     (e) One member from a list of 3 names submitted by the

 

Michigan judges association.

 

     (f) One member from a list of 3 names submitted by the

 

Michigan district judges association.

 

     (g) One member from a list of 3 names submitted by the state

 

bar of Michigan.

 

     (h) One member from a list of names submitted by bar

 

associations whose primary mission or purpose is to advocate for

 

minority interests. Each bar association described in this

 

subdivision may submit 1 name.

 

     (i) One member from a list of 3 names submitted by the

 

prosecuting attorney's association of Michigan who is a former

 

county prosecuting attorney or former assistant county prosecuting

 

attorney.

 

     (j) One member selected to represent the general public.

 

     (k) One member selected to represent local units of

 

government.

 


     (2) The supreme court chief justice or his or her designee

 

shall serve as an ex officio member of the MIDC without vote.

 

     (3) Individuals nominated for service on the MIDC as provided

 

in subsection (1) shall have significant experience in the defense

 

or prosecution of criminal proceedings or have demonstrated a

 

strong commitment to providing effective representation in indigent

 

criminal defense services. Of the members appointed under this

 

section, the governor shall appoint no fewer than 2 individuals who

 

are not licensed attorneys. Any individual who receives

 

compensation from this state or an indigent criminal defense system

 

for providing prosecution of or representation to indigent adults

 

in state courts is ineligible to serve as a member of the MIDC. Not

 

more than 3 judges, whether they are former judges or sitting

 

judges, shall serve on the MIDC at the same time. The governor may

 

reject the names submitted under subsection (1) and request

 

additional names.

 

     (4) MIDC members shall hold office until their successors are

 

appointed. The terms of the members shall be staggered. Initially,

 

4 members shall be appointed for a term of 4 years each, 4 members

 

shall be appointed for a term of 3 years each, 4 members shall be

 

appointed for a term of 2 years each, and 3 members shall be

 

appointed for a term of 1 year each.

 

     (5) The governor shall fill a vacancy occurring in the

 

membership of the MIDC in the same manner as the original

 

appointment, except if the vacancy is for an appointment described

 

in subsection (1)(d), the source of the nomination shall submit a

 

list of 3 names for each vacancy. However, if the senate majority

 


leader or the speaker of the house of representatives is the source

 

of the nomination, 1 name shall be submitted. If an MIDC member

 

vacates his or her commission before the end of the member's term,

 

the governor shall fill that vacancy for the unexpired term only.

 

     (6) The governor shall appoint 1 of the original MIDC members

 

to serve as chairperson of the MIDC for a term of 1 year. At the

 

expiration of that year, or upon the vacancy in the membership of

 

the member appointed chairperson, the MIDC shall annually elect a

 

chairperson from its membership to serve a 1-year term. An MIDC

 

member shall not serve as chairperson of the MIDC for more than 3

 

consecutive terms.

 

     (7) MIDC members shall not receive compensation in that

 

capacity but shall be reimbursed for their reasonable actual and

 

necessary expenses by the state treasurer.

 

     (8) The governor may remove an MIDC member for incompetence,

 

dereliction of duty, malfeasance, misfeasance, or nonfeasance in

 

office, or for any other good cause.

 

     (9) A majority of the MIDC voting members constitute a quorum

 

for the transaction of business at a meeting of the MIDC. A

 

majority of the MIDC voting members are required for official

 

action of the commission.

 

     (10) Confidential case information, including, but not limited

 

to, client information and attorney work product, is exempt from

 

disclosure under the freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL

 

15.231 to 15.246.

 

     Sec. 9. (1) The MIDC has the following authority and duties:

 

     (a) Developing and overseeing the implementation, enforcement,

 


and modification of minimum standards, rules, and procedures to

 

ensure that indigent criminal defense services providing effective

 

assistance of counsel are consistently delivered to all indigent

 

adults in this state consistent with the safeguards of the United

 

States constitution, the state constitution of 1963, and this act.

 

     (b) Investigating, auditing, and reviewing the operation of

 

indigent criminal defense services to assure compliance with the

 

commission's minimum standards, rules, and procedures. However, an

 

indigent criminal defense service that is in compliance with the

 

commission's minimum standards, rules, and procedures shall not be

 

required to provide indigent criminal defense services in excess of

 

those standards, rules, and procedures.

 

     (c) Hiring an executive director and determining the

 

appropriate number of staff needed to accomplish the purpose of the

 

MIDC consistent with annual appropriations.

 

     (d) Assigning the executive director the following duties:

 

     (i) Establishing an organizational chart, preparing an annual

 

budget, and hiring, disciplining, and firing staff.

 

     (ii) Assisting the MIDC in developing, implementing, and

 

regularly reviewing the MIDC's standards, rules, and procedures,

 

including, but not limited to, recommending to the MIDC suggested

 

changes to the criteria for an indigent adult's eligibility for

 

receiving criminal trial defense services under this act.

 

     (e) Establishing procedures for the receipt and resolution of

 

complaints, and the implementation of recommendations from the

 

courts, other participants in the criminal justice system, clients,

 

and members of the public.

 


     (f) Establishing procedures for the mandatory collection of

 

data concerning the operation of the MIDC, each individual attorney

 

providing indigent criminal defense services, each indigent

 

criminal defense system, and the operation of indigent criminal

 

defense services.

 

     (g) Establishing rules and procedures for indigent criminal

 

defense systems to apply to the MIDC for grants to bring the

 

system's delivery of indigent criminal defense services into

 

compliance with the minimum standards established by the MIDC.

 

     (h) Establishing procedures for annually reporting to the

 

governor, legislature, and supreme court. The report required under

 

this subdivision shall include, but not be limited to,

 

recommendations for improvements and further legislative action.

 

     (2) Upon the appropriation of sufficient funds, the MIDC shall

 

establish minimum standards to carry out the purpose of this act,

 

and collect data from all indigent criminal defense systems and

 

individual attorneys providing indigent criminal defense services

 

to adults. The MIDC shall propose goals for compliance with the

 

minimum standards established under this act consistent with the

 

metrics established under this section and appropriations by this

 

state.

 

     (3) In establishing and overseeing the minimum standards,

 

rules, and procedures described in subsection (1), the MIDC shall

 

emphasize the importance of indigent criminal defense services

 

provided to juveniles under the age of 17 who are tried in the same

 

manner as adults or who may be sentenced in the same manner as

 

adults and to adults with mental impairments.

 


     (4) The MIDC shall be mindful that defense attorneys who

 

provide indigent criminal defense services are partners with the

 

prosecution, law enforcement, and the judiciary in the criminal

 

justice system.

 

     (5) The commission shall establish procedures for the conduct

 

of its affairs and promulgate policies necessary to carry out its

 

powers and duties under this act.

 

     (6) Commission policies shall be placed in an appropriate

 

manual, made publicly available on a website, and made available to

 

all attorneys and professionals providing indigent criminal defense

 

services, the supreme court, the governor, the senate majority

 

leader, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate and

 

house appropriations committees, and the senate and house fiscal

 

agencies.

 

     Sec. 11. (1) The MIDC shall establish minimum standards,

 

rules, and procedures to effectuate the following:

 

     (a) The delivery of indigent criminal defense services shall

 

be independent of the judiciary but ensure that the judges of this

 

state are permitted and encouraged to contribute information and

 

advice concerning that delivery of indigent criminal defense

 

services.

 

     (b) If the caseload is sufficiently high, indigent criminal

 

defense services may consist of both an indigent criminal defender

 

office and the active participation of other members of the state

 

bar.

 

     (c) Trial courts shall assure that each criminal defendant is

 

advised of his or her right to counsel. All adults, except those

 


appearing with retained counsel or those who have made an informed

 

waiver of counsel, shall be screened for eligibility under this

 

act, and counsel shall be assigned as soon as an indigent adult is

 

determined to be eligible for indigent criminal defense services.

 

     (2) The MIDC shall implement minimum standards, rules, and

 

procedures to guarantee the right of indigent defendants to the

 

assistance of counsel as provided under amendment VI of the

 

constitution of the United States and section 20 of article I of

 

the state constitution of 1963. In establishing minimum standards,

 

rules, and procedures, the MIDC shall adhere to the following

 

principles:

 

     (a) Defense counsel is provided sufficient time and a space

 

where attorney-client confidentiality is safeguarded for meetings

 

with defense counsel's client.

 

     (b) Defense counsel's workload is controlled to permit

 

effective representation. Economic disincentives or incentives that

 

impair defense counsel's ability to provide effective

 

representation shall be avoided. The MIDC may develop workload

 

controls to enhance defense counsel's ability to provide effective

 

representation.

 

     (c) Defense counsel's ability, training, and experience match

 

the nature and complexity of the case to which he or she is

 

appointed.

 

     (d) The same defense counsel continuously represents and

 

personally appears at every court appearance throughout the

 

pendency of the case. However, indigent criminal defense systems

 

may exempt ministerial, nonsubstantive tasks, and hearings from

 


this prescription.

 

     (e) Defense counsel is required to attend continuing legal

 

education relevant to counsel's indigent defense clients.

 

     (f) Defense counsel is systematically reviewed at the local

 

level for efficiency and for effective representation according to

 

MIDC standards.

 

     (3) The following requirements apply to the application for,

 

and appointment of, indigent criminal defense services under this

 

act:

 

     (a) A preliminary inquiry regarding, and the determination of,

 

the indigency of any defendant shall be made by the court not later

 

than at the defendant's first appearance in court. The

 

determination may be reviewed by the court at any other stage of

 

the proceedings. In determining whether a defendant is entitled to

 

the appointment of counsel, the court shall consider whether the

 

defendant is indigent and the extent of his or her ability to pay.

 

The court may consider such factors as income or funds from

 

employment or any other source, including personal public

 

assistance, to which the defendant is entitled, property owned by

 

the defendant or in which he or she has an economic interest,

 

outstanding obligations, the number and ages of the defendant's

 

dependents, employment and job training history, and his or her

 

level of education.

 

     (b) A defendant is considered to be indigent if he or she is

 

unable, without substantial financial hardship to himself or

 

herself or to his or her dependents, to obtain competent, qualified

 

legal representation on his or her own. Substantial financial

 


hardship shall be rebuttably presumed if the defendant receives

 

personal public assistance, including under the food assistance

 

program, temporary assistance for needy families, medicaid, or

 

disability insurance, resides in public housing, or earns an income

 

less than 140% of the federal poverty guideline. A defendant is

 

also rebuttably presumed to have a substantial financial hardship

 

if he or she is currently serving a sentence in a correctional

 

institution or is receiving residential treatment in a mental

 

health facility.

 

     (c) A defendant not falling below the presumptive thresholds

 

described in subdivision (b) shall be subjected to a more rigorous

 

screening process to determine if his or her particular

 

circumstances, including the seriousness of the charges being

 

faced, his or her monthly expenses, and local private counsel rates

 

would result in a substantial hardship if he or she were required

 

to retain private counsel.

 

     (d) A defendant shall be responsible for applying for indigent

 

defense counsel and for establishing his or her indigency and

 

eligibility for appointed counsel under this act. Any oral or

 

written statements made by the defendant in or for use in the

 

criminal proceeding and material to the issue of his or her

 

indigency shall be made under oath or an equivalent affirmation.

 

     Sec. 13. (1) All indigent criminal defense systems and, at the

 

direction of the supreme court, attorneys engaged in providing

 

indigent criminal defense services shall cooperate and participate

 

with the MIDC in the investigation, audit, and review of their

 

indigent criminal defense services.

 


     (2) A local unit of government may submit to the MIDC an

 

estimate of the cost of developing the plan and cost analysis for

 

implementing the plan under subsection (3) to the MIDC for

 

approval. Upon approval, the MIDC shall award the local unit of

 

government a grant to pay the approved costs for developing the

 

plan and cost analysis under subsection (3).

 

     (3) No later than 180 days after a standard is approved by the

 

supreme court, each indigent criminal defense system shall submit a

 

plan to the MIDC for the provision of indigent criminal defense

 

services in a manner as determined by the MIDC. A plan submitted

 

under this subsection shall specifically address how the minimum

 

standards established by the MIDC under this act shall be met and

 

shall include a cost analysis. This cost analysis shall include a

 

statement of the funds in excess of the local share, if any,

 

necessary to allow its system to comply with the MIDC's minimum

 

standards.

 

     (4) The MIDC may approve or disapprove a plan or cost

 

analysis, or both a plan and cost analysis, submitted under

 

subsection (3), and shall do so within 60 calendar days of the

 

submission of the plan and cost analysis. If the MIDC disapproves

 

the plan, the cost analysis, or both the plan and the cost

 

analysis, the indigent criminal defense system shall consult with

 

the MIDC and submit a new plan, a new cost analysis, or both within

 

60 calendar days of the new submission. If after 3 submissions a

 

compromise is not reached, the state court administrative office

 

shall appoint a mediator agreed to by the MIDC and the indigent

 

criminal defense system within 30 calendar days to mediate the

 


dispute as provided under subsection (5). Any mediation costs

 

associated with mediation of the dispute shall be paid equally by

 

the parties.

 

     (5) Mediation of the dispute shall commence within 30 calendar

 

days after the mediator is appointed and finish within 60 calendar

 

days of its commencement. If the parties do not come to a dispute

 

of the dispute, both of the following apply:

 

     (a) The mediator may submit his or her recommendation of how

 

the dispute should be resolved to the MIDC within 30 calendar

 

days for the MIDC's consideration.

 

     (b) The MIDC shall consider the recommendation of the

 

mediator, if any, and shall determine the final parameters of the

 

plan or the cost analysis, or both within 30 calendar days, and the

 

indigent criminal defense system shall implement the plan and cost

 

analysis as determined by the MIDC.

 

     (6) If an indigent criminal defense system fails to comply

 

with the requirements of subsection (5)(b), the MIDC shall proceed

 

under section 15.

 

     (7) The MIDC shall submit a report to the governor, the senate

 

majority leader, the speaker of the house of representatives, and

 

the appropriations committees of the senate and house of

 

representatives requesting the appropriation of funds necessary to

 

implement the plan for each system approved by the MIDC. The

 

information used to create this report shall be made available to

 

the governor, the senate majority leader, the speaker of the house

 

of representatives, and the appropriations committees of the senate

 

and house of representatives.

 


     (8) An indigent criminal defense system shall maintain not

 

less than its local share. If the MIDC determines that funding in

 

excess of the indigent criminal defense system's share is necessary

 

in order to bring its system into compliance with the minimum

 

standards established by the MIDC, that excess funding shall be

 

paid by this state. The legislature shall appropriate to the MIDC

 

the additional funds necessary for a system to meet and maintain

 

those minimum standards, which funds shall be provided to indigent

 

criminal defense systems through grants as described in subsection

 

(9).

 

     (9) Except as provided in section 15, an indigent criminal

 

defense system shall not be required to provide funds in excess of

 

its local share. The MIDC shall provide grants to indigent criminal

 

defense systems to assist in bringing the systems into compliance

 

with minimum standards established by the MIDC.

 

     (10) This state shall appropriate funds to the MIDC for grants

 

to the local units of government for the reasonable costs

 

associated with data required to be collected under this act that

 

is over and above the local unit of government's data costs for

 

other purposes.

 

     (11) Within 180 days after receiving funds from the MIDC under

 

subsection (9), an indigent criminal defense system shall comply

 

with the terms of the grant in bringing its system into compliance

 

with the minimum standards established by the MIDC for effective

 

assistance of counsel.

 

     (12) The MIDC may apply for and obtain grants from any source

 

to carry out the purposes of this act. All funds received by MIDC,

 


from any source, are state funds and shall be appropriated as

 

provided by law.

 

     Sec. 15. (1) If an indigent criminal defense system fails to

 

comply with section 13 within 60 calendar days, the MIDC shall

 

undertake the administration of indigent criminal defense services

 

for the indigent criminal defense system, and in addition to paying

 

its local share, the indigent criminal defense system shall pay the

 

following assessments as the MIDC determines are necessary in order

 

to bring the indigent criminal defense system into compliance with

 

the minimum standards established by the MIDC:

 

     (a) In the first year, 10% of the state's costs.

 

     (b) In the second year, 20% of the state's costs.

 

     (c) In the third year, 30% of the state's costs.

 

     (d) In the fourth year, or any subsequent year, 40% of the

 

state's costs.

 

     (2) An indigent criminal defense system may resume the

 

administration of indigent criminal defense services at any time

 

upon approval by the MIDC of its plan for the provision of indigent

 

crime defense services and cost analysis. When a system resumes

 

that administration, it is no longer required to pay an assessment

 

under subsection (1) but shall be required to pay no less than its

 

share.

 

     Sec. 17. The MIDC shall publish and make available to the

 

public on a website its annual report, its budget, and a listing of

 

all expenditures. Publication and availability of the listing of

 

expenditures shall be on a quarterly basis, except for the annual

 

report and salary information, which may be published and made

 


available on an annual basis. As used in this section,

 

"expenditures" means all payments or disbursements of MIDC funds,

 

received from any source, made by the MIDC.

 

     Sec. 19. Both of the following apply to the MIDC:

 

     (a) The freedom of information act, 1976 PA 442, MCL 15.231 to

 

15.246, except as provided in section 7(10).

 

     (b) The open meetings act, 1976 PA 267, MCL 15.261 to 15.275.

 

     Sec. 21. (1) Nothing in this act should be construed to

 

overrule, expand, or extend, either directly or by analogy, any

 

decisions reached by the United States supreme court or the supreme

 

court of this state regarding the effective assistance of counsel.

 

     (2) Nothing in this act shall be construed to override section

 

29 or 30 of article IX of the state constitution of 1963.

 

     (3) The failure of an indigent criminal defense system to

 

comply with statutory duties imposed under this act does not create

 

a cause of action against the government or system.

 

     (4) Statutory duties imposed that create a higher standard

 

than that imposed by the United States constitution or the state

 

constitution of 1963 do not create a cause of action against a

 

local unit of government, an indigent criminal defense system, or

 

this state.

 

     (5) Violations of MIDC rules that do not constitute

 

ineffective assistance of counsel under the United States

 

constitution or the state constitution of 1963 do not constitute

 

grounds for a conviction to be reversed or a judgment to be

 

modified for ineffective assistance of counsel.