GRADUATED LICENSE: CELL PHONE USE S.B. 756 (S-3):
FLOOR SUMMARY
Senate Bill 756 (Substitute S-3 as reported) (as enacted)
Sponsor: Senator Howard C. Walker
Committee: Energy and Technology
CONTENT
The bill would add Section 602c to the Michigan Vehicle Code to prohibit a person issued a level 1 or 2 graduated driver license from using a cellular telephone while operating a motor vehicle, and designate a violation as a civil infraction.
The prohibition would not apply to an individual who was using a cell phone to do any of the following:
-- Report a traffic accident, medical emergency, or serious road hazard.
-- Report a situation in which the person believed his or her personal safety was in jeopardy.
-- Report or avert the perpetration or potential perpetration of a criminal act against the individual or another person.
The prohibition also would not apply to a person using a voice-operated system integrated into the vehicle.
No points could be entered for a violation of Section 602c, and the Secretary of State could not enter a civil infraction determination for a violation on the master driving record.
Section 602c would supersede all local ordinances regulating the use of a cell phone by a level 1 or 2 driver while operating a motor vehicle in motion on a highway or street. A local unit, however, could adopt an ordinance or enforce an existing one substantially corresponding to Section 602c.
Section 602c would be named "Kelsey's Law".
(Under the Code, for a civil infraction, a person may be ordered to pay a civil fine of up to $100, as well as the costs of the action up to $100. Unless the total fine and costs imposed are $10 or less, the person also may be ordered to pay a justice system assessment of $40.)
MCL 257.320a et al. Legislative Analyst: Julie Cassidy
FISCAL IMPACT
There are no data to indicate how many level 1 or 2 graduated drivers would be found in violation of this offense; however, additional fine revenue would benefit public libraries.
Date Completed: 2-29-12 Fiscal Analyst: Dan O'Connor
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.