SCOUTING ORGANIZATIONS: INCOME TAX CHECKOFF
House Bill 6421
Sponsor: Rep. Jeff Mayes
House Bills 6422 and 6467
Sponsor: Rep. Paul Opsommer
House Bill 6466
Sponsor: Rep. Shanelle Jackson
Committee: Tax Policy
Complete to12-9-08
A SUMMARY OF HOUSE BILLS 6421, 6422, 6466,AND 6467 AS INTRODUCED
House Bill 6421 would create a new act known as the Boy Scouts of Michigan Fund Act to establish the Boy Scouts of Michigan Fund. The fund would provide money to any Boy Scout organization within the state "to prepare young people to make ethical and moral choices over their lifetimes by instilling in them the values of the scout oath and law."
House Bill 6422would amend the Income Tax Act (MCL 206.435) to create an income tax checkoff permitting taxpayers to contribute money (subtracted from a refund or added to a tax liability) to the Boy Scouts of Michigan Fund from their income tax return.
House Bill 6466 would amend the Income Tax Act (MCL 206.435) to create an income tax checkoff enabling taxpayers to contribute money (subtracted from a refund or added to a tax liability) to the Girl Scouts of Michigan Fund.
House Bill 6467would create a new act known as the Girl Scouts of
Michigan Fund Act to establish the Girl Scouts of Michigan Fund. The fund
would provides money to any
Girl Scout organization within the state "to engage girls of all ages in
discovering self, connecting with others, and taking action to make the world a
better place."
FISCAL IMPACT:
Taxpayer donations would come from income taxpayers' refunds or would increase their tax liability. Based on fromMichigan and other states, between $200,000 and $500,000 could be generated annual from a checkoff. However, the popularity of a particular checkoff and the creation of additional checkoffs affect the revenue generated for each one. The bill would have no direct fiscal impact on local units of government. Under provisions of existing law, the new checkoffs would be added to the income tax form as soon as practical, and could be eliminated if they fail to raise at least $100,000 in a tax year for two consecutive years.
Legislative Analyst: Mark Wolf
Fiscal Analyst: Rebecca Ross
■ This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan House staff for use by House members in their deliberations, and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.